SCC Decision Clarifies Right of Privacy in Shared Digital Devices

In December the Supreme Court of Canada released their decision in R v Reeves. This decision considered what expectation of privacy an individual has in a shared digital device, such as a shared computer or tablet. The Court found that a third-party, even one who has access to the shared device, cannot unilaterally consent to a police search and seizure of the device.

In Reeves, the accused’s estranged common-law wife had consented to the police seizing and searching a shared device in order to look for evidence of possession of child pornography. The accused was facing a domestic assault charge at the time and had conditions preventing him from being at the residence during the time his ex-partner consented to the seizure.

The Supreme Court affirmed the test that a Court must apply in order to determine whether an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a shared digital device. The majority also confirmed that control over or ownership of the computing device, while relevant, is not determinative of whether a subjective expectation of privacy is objectively reasonable.

Link to the decision: https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/17405/index.do

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Practice Areas

Get In Contact With One Of Our Lawyers

Related Posts

Defending Against Assault Charges in Ottawa: What Are Your Legal Options?

Understanding Ontario’s DUI Laws: What You Need to Know if You’ve Been Arrested

The Role of a Criminal Defense Lawyer: What to Expect During Your Case

Charged With a DUI in Ottawa? Here’s How a DUI Lawyer Can Help You Fight the Case

Criminal Law Services in Ottawa: Everything You Need to Know

Common Criminal Charges in Ottawa and How a Defense Lawyer Can Help