Recent Supreme Court of Canada Case regarding Warrantless Searches

The Supreme Court recently ruled in the case of R v Paterson, 2017 SCC 15, that police cannot search your home without a warrant simply because it would be impractical to obtain one. Warrantless entries must be compelled by urgency, immediate police action to preserve evidence, or officer and/or public safety. The decision highlights the importance of the section 8 right against unreasonable search and seizure of the home.

The facts of the case unusual. Paterson agreed to let the police enter his residence in order to surrender several marijuana roaches with the police telling him they would treat it as a “no case” seizure (meaning they would seize them to destroy them, but not charge him). Once inside the residence, the police observed firearms and drugs and arrested Paterson. The issue was whether the warrantless entry by the police was a violation of Paterson’s section 8 rights. The Court found that in this case, the Crown could not satisfy the requirement to prove exigent circumstances to allow the warrantless search.

The Court noted “In this case, the police had a practicable option: To arrest the appellant and obtain a warrant to enter the residence and seize the roaches. If, as the Crown says, the situation was not serious enough to arrest and apply for a warrant, then it cannot have been serious enough to intrude into a private residence without a warrant.”

Link to the case:

Link to news article on the case:


Practice Areas

Get In Contact With One Of Our Lawyers

Related Posts

Your Next Steps After a Licence Suspension

Each Step Of The Court Process Explained

Everything To Know About Your Crown Pre-Trial

Unlawfully in a Dwelling VS Break and Enter

Understanding The Punishments For Domestic Violence In Canada

Getting Domestic Assault Charges Dropped in Ontario